All Issue

2020 Vol.14, Issue 6

Research Article

December 2020. pp. 565-576
Abstract
References
1
Abbate, T., Cesaroni, F., Cinici, M.C., Villari, M. (2019). Business models for developing smart cities. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of an IoT platform. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 183-193. 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.031
2
Choi, J.U., Chun, E.Y. (2019). A Study on Smart City Planning Method for Residents' Experience by Applying the Concept of Core Index. Journal of the Korean Institute of Culture Architecture, 66, 141-150.
3
Díaz-Díaz, R., Muñoz, L., Pérez-González, D. (2017). Business model analysis of public services operating in the smart city ecosystem: The case of SmartSantander. Future Generation Computer Systems, 76, 198-214. 10.1016/j.future.2017.01.032
4
Han, S.H., Shin, Y.S., Yu, I.J., Lee, J.Y. (2018). A Study on the Korea Smart City Certification Index and Demonstration Authentication. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 19(1), 688-698.
5
Hwang, J.S. (2017). National Strategy Research Tasks through Smart City Development Trends and Issues. Information & communications magazine, 34(8), 14-18.
6
Kim, B.G., Kim, J.H., Lee, C.S. (2012). Development and Application of an Evaluation Model for Ubiquitous City Project. The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, 17(2), 87-104. 10.7838/jsebs.2012.17.2.087
7
Lee, M.S., Leem, C.S. (2019). A Study on Performance Evaluation of the Korea Smart City Demonstration Service. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 44(10), 1992-2002. 10.7840/kics.2019.44.10.1992
8
Perboli, G., De Marco, A., Perfetti, F., Marone, M. (2014). A new taxonomy of smart city projects. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 470-478. 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.028
9
Quak, H., Balm, S., Posthumus, B. (2014). Evaluation of city logistics solutions with business model analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 125, 111-124. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1460
10
Ryou, H.S., Lee, D.H. (2016). A Comparative Study on Analytical Tools of Business Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(5), 137-147. 10.14400/JDC.2016.14.5.137
11
Shin, W.J., Kim, D.N., Cho, Y.T., Park, S.W. (2015). Comparative Analysis Research on the Difference Between U-City and Smart City for the Establishment of International Competitiveness of U-City. Journal of The Urban Design Insitute of Korea, 16(5), 5-16.
12
Suh, N.P. (1998). Axiomatic design theory for systems. Research in engineering design, 10(4), 189-209. 10.1007/s001639870001
13
Walravens, N. (2015). Qualitative indicators for smart city business models: The case of mobile services and applications. Telecommunications Policy, 39(3-4), 218-240. 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.011
14
Monzon, A. (2015). Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects. Paper Presented at the 2015 International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems: INSTICC. Lisbon, Portugal. 1-11. 10.1007/978-3-319-27753-0_2
15
Shin, J.S., Shin, S.M., Han, J.K., Park, H.K. (2013). Developing Indicators for Measuring Grenes of Urban Infrastructure based on Axiomatic Design. Paper presented at the 39th KSCE Convention 2013. 1489-1499.
16
Tanda, A., De Marco, A. (2019). Business Model Framework for Smart City Mobility Projects. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(9), 1-11. 10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092082
17
Ahn, Y.J., Lee, S.H., Yoo, M.O. (2018). Establishing Smart City Model Based on Citizen Participation. Daejeon: Daejeon Sejong Research Institute.
18
Antunes, C., Bohnsack, R., Caridade, L., Gregorio, V., Groot, J., Hoed, R., Khan. S., Matos. L., Mendes. R., Oliveira. A., Pruggler. N., Tamis. M., Teixeira. J., Thorsdottir, H. (2018). me²: Integrated Smart City Mobility and Energy Platform. Netherlands: Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
19
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). (2019a). Third Smart City Comprehensive Plan. Sejong: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
20
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT). (2019b). Implementation Plan for Sejong Smart City National Demonstration City. Sejong: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
21
Navigant Research. (2019). Smart City Tracker 2Q19. Boulder: Navigant Consulting. Inc.
22
SharingCities. (2020). Retrofit of privately owned buildings Privately-owned buildings and multi-property buildings. Brussels: EUROCITIES.
23
U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). (2015). Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge. DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.
24
CATALYST. (2020). https://project-catalyst.eu., Accessed: September 23, 2020.
25
DOLL. (2020). https://doll-livinglab.com, Accessed: September 23, 2020.
26
Luminext. (2020). https://www.luminext.eu/en/project/municipality-of-renkum-becomes- smart-city/, Accessed: September 23, 2020.
27
Woods, E. (2019). Scaling Smart City Solutions: City Leadership and Technology Innovation. https://guidehouseinsights.com/news-and-views/scaling-smart-city-solutions- city-leadership-and-technology-innovation, Accessed: September 23, 2020.
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국건축친환경설비학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국건축친환경설비학회 논문집
  • Volume : 14
  • No :6
  • Pages :565-576
  • Received Date :2020. 10. 12
  • Revised Date :2020. 11. 09
  • Accepted Date : 2020. 11. 09
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems Journal of Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crosscheck
  • open access
  • orcid
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • KISTI Current Status
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close